View Full Version : Aromatic vs. Ashburne
KMafooz
02-01-2009, 12:10 AM
hey now....
I have 50# of aromatic, but need 50# of ashburne. I know they are both malty, with the aromatic being more so. Think I can get away with subbing the aromatic into a 425# grist bill for the ashburne? It's going to be a pilsner, btw.
Cheers & thanks
KMafooz
beertje46
02-01-2009, 08:31 AM
The Aromatic is darker; 17 - 21 degree L., Ashburne is 5.3. A small amount of Aromatic would work well in a Pils, Vienna would be a better fit.
Woolsocks
02-02-2009, 08:42 AM
Aromatic is Briesses brand name for their 2-row dark Munich. Ashburne is their much paler English-style "Mild" malt. I'm not sure I'd put either of those in a pils, but the Mild will at least give you the right color.
beertje46
02-02-2009, 09:00 AM
I didn't know Briess did an aromatic. I use Dingemann's.
Briess Munich 20 (http://www.brewingwithbriess.com/Assets/PDFs/Briess_PIS_Munich_Malt_20L_WK.pdf)
Briess "Aromatic" (http://www.brewingwithbriess.com/Assets/PDFs/Briess_PIS_Aromatic_Malt_WK.pdf)
I suspect the Briess "Aromatic" is as close to real Belgian Aromatic as their Extra Special Malt is to real Belgian Special B.
Woolsocks
02-02-2009, 09:03 AM
My understanding, based on a brochure from Briess, is that Aromatic and Bonlander are 2Row versions of their Munich 20L and Munich 10L, which are made from 6row barley.
KMafooz
02-09-2009, 09:30 PM
Thanks for the word!
Cheers!
vBulletin® v3.5.8, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.